In a bold and controversial directive delivered to his newly sworn-in commissioners, Governor Monday Okpebholo has decreed that no one shall be admitted into executive council meetings unless wearing the signature “Asiwaju” cap — a style associated with President Bola Tinubu.
During a recent address, the governor was seen admonishing his commissioners:
“If you come in full traditional attire but without this Asiwaju cap, you won’t be allowed entry.”
The statement elicited cheers from the gathering, including chants of “No Asiwaju, no entry.”
Rationale and Reception
Governor Okpebholo previously emphasized the cap’s symbolic importance, positioning it as a mark of unity and alignment with the ideals of national leadership.
He intimated that the requirement was not merely ceremonial but a matter of protocol under his administration.
Even so, the instruction has ignited fierce debate across social media and civic platforms. Critics argue that it amounts to “the idolisation of power”, turning a piece of clothing into a litmus test for loyalty rather than merit.
A user named Obiorah Otu captured the mood succinctly: “When leadership turns into worship, governance dies a slow death… Loyalty measured by cap style, not ideas, is a failing blueprint.”
Other commentators lambasted the move as an erosion of decorum and democratic values, warning that such demands could pave the way toward authoritarian symbolism dressed up in cultural trappings.
Beyond The Cheers
This episode spotlights deeper tensions in Nigerian politics—between symbolic displays of allegiance and the substantive substance of accountable governance. While governors and leaders often adopt fashion or regalia to assert identity, enforcing such symbolism in official functions risks alienating dissent and elevating style over substance.
Also Read: Senate Drama: Natasha Akpoti’s Motion Ignored by Colleagues
Given Nigeria’s fraught political environment, even modest mandates can become lightning rods. For Governor Okpebholo and his administration, the challenge will be to sustain ministerial competence and civic trust—beyond the visual staging of loyalty.
