• info@dailyoracleng.com
  • adsales@dailyoracleng.com
Thursday, 11 SeptemberWeather Icon13°C
site logo

September 8, 2025

Annie Macaulay Opens Up: “My Daughters Deserve Better”
Entertainment, News

Annie Macaulay Opens Up: “My Daughters Deserve Better”

/

Annie Macaulay’s Instagram post isn’t just another celebrity quote, it’s a raw emblem of a mother’s journey from pain to freedom.

Through a few vulnerable lines, she channeled the grief of the past and the fierce hope for her daughters’ futures.

In her words, “I hope my daughter doesn’t accept things I’ve accepted… She knows her worth from the start and knows that no matter what, she always has me in her corner.”
“If you see me happy these days—let me be. I fought battles you’ll never know just to feel this free.”
“Every wound she ever survived became another jewel in her crown.”

This is not just confession, it’s manifesto. And through it, Annie invites us into her world: one where hurt became armor, resilience staved off despair, and healing wasn’t the end—it was the beginning of protecting her legacy.

Reimagining A Legacy Through Storytelling

Annie’s words peel back the glamor of celebrity life to reveal what’s often hidden: the emotional labor, the stigma, and the personal costs of maintaining “peace.”

This isn’t about a divorce; it’s about the scars behind her smile, the quiet affirmations made in the dark, and the relentless promise to herself that her daughters will never wear those wounds.

Her message isn’t a lecture, it’s a life insurance. She’s telling her girls: “You’ll have no reason to replicate the pain I endured. You are valuable. Always.” For many Nigerian women who endured silence or sacrifice, this pledge resonates as both revolutionary and deeply overdue.

Did You Miss? GehGeh Buys ₦150M Mercedes After Bashing Rich Car Buys

Annie’s happiness isn’t performative—it’s defiance. In a society quick to pit women as victims or villains in divorce narratives, choosing joy is a radical act. She rewritten the ending of her own story—away from shame, blame, or reclamation—and authored a rebirth instead.

From Wounds To Jewels

Annie Macaulay’s words are both wound and balm. They reveal that healing isn’t just personal—it’s political. In a society that often expects women to bear silent burdens, announcing one’s freedom and success becomes an act of courage, of care, and of unyielding maternal love.

For her daughters—and all daughters watching—this post says the same thing: You deserve better. And I will spend my life making sure you get it.

Dangote Concedes: Workers Can Join NUPENG
Business, News

Dangote Concedes: Workers Can Join NUPENG

/

In a stunning policy reversal, Dangote Group has yielded to massive pressure, allowing newly recruited Dangote Refinery drivers to join the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG).

The move ends a bitter, high-stakes standoff that threatened to spark a nationwide strike and cripple fuel distribution across Nigeria—raising tough questions about corporate power, worker rights, and government intervention.

For many, this isn’t simply a concession, it’s a symbol of labour pushing back against a private leviathan.

Sources at the meeting told Frontpage that an MOU is currently being drafted to be signed by parties.

According to the sources, parties are also looking at the possibility of a two week time frame for implementation of the MOU.

What Changed — Labor Wins A Battle

* Dangote Refinery had initially barred its CNG tanker drivers from joining NUPENG, reportedly requiring them to sign undertakings acknowledging no union membership.
* The company cited its private distribution model using 4,000 CNG-powered trucks as justification to sideline unions—but labour experts said this violated both Nigeria’s Constitution and international ILO conventions.
* Persistent threats of strike action, combined with support from PENGASSAN, NLC, and mounting public pressure, appear to have forced a change in policy.

Labour Found Its Roar

This isn’t just about union access—it touches deeper fault lines in Nigeria’s political economy:

1. Workers vs. Monopoly
Dangote Refinery’s business strategy shows how dominant firms can bypass traditional labour structures. Reversing that stance reinforces the idea that even the largest private interests can’t ignore workers’ rights.

2. Legal Victory for Freedom of Association
Labour laws, including Nigeria’s Constitution, the Labour Act, and ILO conventions, ensure the right to organise. Dangote’s reversal validates that no corporate policy can negate fundamental rights.

Also Read: Amaechi Silence Reports Of Stalling Dangote Refinery In Rivers

3. A Strategic Retreat, Not a Surrender
The turnaround could be pragmatic—Dangote may have calculated that waiting out the storm would cost more than the concession. Either way, it sends a message: unions backed by strategy can win.

4. Precedent for Private Sector Labor Relations
Other private actors, especially in critical infrastructure, will now face pressure to reconsider union resistance, potentially reshaping how labour operates in Nigeria’s privatized sectors.

What’s Still At Stake — A Cautious Celebration

* Implementation Watch: Will Dangote truly open union doors, or is this a symbolic gesture? Workers and unions must demand transparency in how it’s rolled out.
* Labour’s Leverage: Does the victory translate into safer working conditions, better pay, and sustained union representation—or will it be short-lived optics?
* Government Oversight: The Federal Government must ensure the concession is enforced across all Dangote subsidiaries, not just the headline-grabbing refinery.
* Future Corporate Tactics: Watch if other conglomerates use similar tactics—resist, wait for backlash, then concede under duress. That’s not real change, just PR management.

A Turning Point, But Not The Final Chapter

This reversal marks a significant moment: corporate resistance to unionization has been cracked—by combined pressure and legal leverage.

Yet, the true test lies ahead: maintaining gains, ensuring accountability, and extending labor justice into everyday practice. The danger remains that this fragile victory becomes yet another headline and not the foundation of enduring reform.

GehGeh Buys ₦150M Mercedes After Bashing Rich Car Buys
Entertainment, News

GehGeh Buys ₦150M Mercedes After Bashing Rich Car Buys

/

GehGeh, real name Emmanuel Obruste, built a reputation as a no-nonsense financial and relationship advisor through his online platform, GehGeh University.

He derided flashy car purchases, publicly shaming celebrities like Davido for bestowing expensive rides on staff. Yet on September 8, 2025, he dropped his most dramatic message yet: a red Mercedes-Benz GLE 43, reportedly worth ₦150 million, now parked in his garage. The irony isn’t lost on Nigerians, and the internet is buzzing with both admiration and alarm.

Celebration Mixed With Controversy

1. The Hippo Who Forgot His Own Rules

GehGeh earned both fame and online flames by calling out lavish spending as irresponsible. Now, he appears to have flipped the script, making many wonder whether his message was more about optics than actual financial discipline.

2. The Lamborghini Effect: Crush or Carry?

A ₦150 million splurge signals success, or hubris. Is this purchase a genuine flex of freedom, or a distraction from his financial teachings? His fans’ ambivalence suggests the line between admiration and irony is razor-thin.

3. Influencer Paradox: Earned, or Spent Too Soon?

At just 22, GehGeh’s newfound affluence raises eyebrows. Viewers are eager to know—did TikTok monetization fund this? Or was it poorly timed splurging?

Financial Wisdom

GehGeh’s red Mercedes isn’t just a car, it’s a narrative that tests his brand’s consistency. In the gig economy, anyone can become overnight success, but sustaining authenticity is harder.

You May Like: President Tinubu Removes John Umunubo As SA on Digital and Creative Economy

If financial wisdom means sacrificing a flashy lifestyle, GehGeh’s photos may be his toughest lesson yet, either in confidence or contradiction.

NUPENG Insists on Strike Despite FG’s Last-Minute Intervention
News

FG Meets NUPENG & Dangote: Emergency Talks to Avert Nationwide Fuel Strike Begins

/

In what could become Labour’s flashpoint of the year, the Federal Government convened an emergency meeting on Monday with the Dangote Group and the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) to prevent the imminent strike aimed at grinding the nation’s fuel supply into a halt.

The Minister of Labour and Employment, Muhammad Dingyadi, led the talks, joined by his counterpart, Nkiruka Onyejeocha, as well as representatives from NLC, TUC, and NMDPRA. The stakes couldn’t be higher, fuel and energy stability remain the economic arteries of Nigeria. Officials warned of immense revenue losses and public hardship if a resolution isn’t reached swiftly.

Why This Feels Like Disaster Waiting to Happen

1. The Strike Threat Is Real—and Rooted

NUPENG’s decision to strike stems from Dangote Refinery’s policy allegedly denying tanker operators’ union rights. This isn’t a one-off grievance: it touches on constitutional freedom to associate, labor dignity, and the industry’s structure.

2. Strategic Silence and Societal Fallout

As negotiations unfold behind closed doors, the public’s patience is already wearing thin. One day without strike control could send prices spiraling higher or stunt fuel movement completely.

3. A Broader Labour Crisis

The strike isn’t siloed. PENGASSAN has voiced support for NUPENG and threatened to join in solidarity. Meanwhile, ITUC-Africa is sounding the alarm about Dangote’s anti-union posture being a continental assault on labor rights.

The Fight Is Bigger Than Fuel – It’s About Control

What began over union representation has morphed into a test of Nigeria’s labor resilience. If Dangote stands its ground, some analysts fear lasting precedents of corporate veto power over worker representation. If NUPENG holds firm, it could energize other strikes and cripple the refinery.

And if FG delivers only platitudes—or worse, capitulates quietly—that could expose a fault line between public welfare and big business.

What Happens If They Don’t Reach Agreement?

* Fuel Supply Crash: Immediate shortages and inflated black-market prices.
* Parallel Unrest: Civic anger may sweep into protests aligned with unions.
* Policy Backlash: Unions demand strict regulation of refinery distribution models.
* Labor Law Reckoning: Calls may intensify for legal reform to blunt anti-union policies.
* Investor Alarm: Global eyes watching Nigeria’s ability to balance industrial harmony and capitalism.

Putting It All in Perspective

This emergency meeting wasn’t just about oil tankers—it was a crucible testing labor rights, presidential resolve, and corporate power.

You May Like: JAMB UTME Cheats in High-Tech Collusion: Parents, CBT Centres Exposed

Nigeria’s long-term health relies not just on fuel delivery routes but on developing a political culture that values labor law and equitable growth.

What happens next isn’t just a strike conversation, it’s a referendum on what Nigeria wants its labour relations to look like in the decades ahead.

Amaechi Silence Reports Of Stalling Dangote Refinery In Rivers
News

Amaechi Silence Reports Of Stalling Dangote Refinery In Rivers

/

A furious claim from a former federal lawmaker has set off one of the most explosive political arguments of the moment: that Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, former governor of Rivers State and ex-minister, blocked Aliko Dangote from siting his mega-refinery in Rivers, allegedly by making personal demands and delaying negotiations.

Amaechi has rejected the charge outright, calling it false and politically motivated. The clash has quickly moved from gossip to a full-blown political fight with real economic and reputational stakes.

The Accusation That Lit The Fuse

The row began when Eld. Chidi Wihioka, a former member of the House of Representatives, told TV audiences that Dangote once planned to site the refinery in Rivers but left after a meeting with Amaechi.

Wihioka alleged that Amaechi kept Dangote waiting, then made personal demands that drove the businessman away, costing Rivers the opportunity to host what would have been a transformational industrial project. The charge has since been amplified online and in local political circles.

Amaechi’s Response: Denial And Counter-claim

Amaechi has pushed back hard. He insists Dangote never formally sought land to build a refinery in Port Harcourt and that the story is simply untrue. In his rebuttal — shared publicly — he says he even offered Dangote a suitable site opposite Onne Seaport and that he never demanded personal gains.

Supporters of Amaechi argue the allegation is designed to damage his reputation amid wider political jockeying in Rivers.

Who Else Has Spoken — And What They Said

The controversy has split local voices. Some elders and critics have demanded that Amaechi clarify the record; others — including notable APC figures — have dismissed Wihioka’s claims as false and self-serving. Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, an APC chieftain, publicly defended Amaechi, calling the allegation baseless and insisting Dangote’s decision to site the refinery in Lekki was never hindered by the former governor.

The media swirl has included social clips, opinion pieces and defensive statements — typical theater when politics and big money collide.

The Prize

The Dangote Refinery — now sited in Lekki, Lagos — is not a normal factory. It is a 650,000 bpd, US$19+ billion project that reorders the national energy economy, creates tens of thousands of jobs, and shifts investment patterns across regions.

If Rivers had hosted (or even negotiated seriously for) such a project, the economic dividends could have been transformative for local infrastructure, employment and revenue. Claims that Rivers lost that prize — whether true or not — ignite very real feelings of grievance, lost opportunity, and political betrayal.

Beneath The Surface

This isn’t just about Dangote or Amaechi. It sits inside a broader fight over Rivers’s political future: rival factions in the APC and PDP, gubernatorial ambitions, and the way big industrial projects are used as bargaining chips.

Also Read: NSCDC Officer Shot Dead in Abuja Hotel — Probe Demanded

Accusations about who “gave” or “denied” a project are shorthand for deeper fights over patronage, local contracts, and which elites get the jobs, land leases, and downstream spin-offs. In short: it’s loot, power and legacy dressed up as public policy.

Investors Watch Closely — Reputational Risk is Real

Every multinational and major investor monitors political stability and the rule of law. When public leaders trade allegations about who blocked whose investment, the message to outside capital is simple and chilling: land deals and mega-projects in Nigeria can be derailed by politics, rumor, or unrecorded private demands.

That raises the cost of doing business — legal fees, risk premiums, and the need for stronger political risk insurance. If Rivers wants future big projects, this spat is exactly the kind of negative PR it cannot afford.

Inconvenient Uncertainty

At the end of the day, the Amaechi–Dangote story is a cautionary tale about modern Nigeria: the overlap of politics, personal ambition, and massive private capital produces narratives that become truth in the court of public opinion long before evidence is produced.

Whether Amaechi acted to stall a multi-billion-dollar refinery or whether he is the target of a politically useful lie, the outcome will shape political careers and investor confidence—and the public deserves clarity, not gossip.

News, Politics

President Tinubu Removes John Umunubo As SA on Digital and Creative Economy

/

In a move that has shocked Nigeria’s digital and creative economy ecosystem, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Monday ordered the immediate dismissal of Fegho John Umunubo, the Special Assistant to the President on Digital and Creative Economy in the Office of the Vice President.

But this wasn’t just a routine administrative decision.

This was a calculated political purge—and it may have just rattled the foundation of Nigeria’s tech and creative aspirations.

No Explanation. No Successor. Just a Warning.

What made the announcement more controversial wasn’t just its swiftness—it was the ominous disclaimer attached: “Mr. Umunubo no longer represents the administration in any capacity. Anyone who continues to associate with him as such does so at their own risk.” — the presidential statement echoed.

That’s not just an HR update. That’s a political body blow.

This kind of public severing, usually reserved for disgraced officials or political turncoats, begs the question:

What did Fegho do?

Or more importantly…

Who did he offend within the corridors of power?

The Man Behind the Curtain: Who Is Fegho John Umunubo?

Fegho Umunubo isn’t a household name — but he’s been an influential player behind the scenes.

As the SA on Digital and Creative Economy, his role touched:

* Startups and venture funding

* Youth digital literacy programs

* Creative industry regulation

* Digital policy frameworks for job creation

In many ways, he was one of the few bridges between the government and Nigeria’s booming Gen Z innovation class, the coders, content creators, filmmakers, and digital entrepreneurs defining Africa’s new global identity.

Which is why his removal, without reason, is setting off alarm bells.

Is There a Power Struggle in Tinubu’s Inner Circle?

Multiple insiders suggest that Umunubo’s downfall may not be about incompetence — but about politics, ambition, and internal rivalry.

Some unconfirmed theories floating within Aso Rock include:

* Clashes with more powerful aides over access to VP Shettima

* Tensions with industry gatekeepers resistant to disruption

* Pushback against perceived “youth dominance” in policy direction

It’s no secret that Nigeria’s power elites often view the tech and creative sectors with suspicion, too fast, too loud, too democratic.

Could Fegho have been a victim of his proximity to real change?.

A Digital Economy Now in Limbo

Umunubo’s exit leaves Nigeria’s digital economy leadership in disarray — and at a time when billions of dollars are at stake.

Remember:

* The administration announced a $671 million tech and creative investment fund in 2024

* Programs like 3MTT, NYIF, IDICE are supposed to reach millions of young Nigerians

* Tinubu’s own speeches have placed the digital economy at the heart of his job creation strategy

So why gut the engine room?

Also Read: Drama As El-Rufai Answers Police Invitation With Petition

Unless the government moves swiftly to appoint a credible, experienced, and independent-minded successor, it risks:

* Investor apathy

* Erosion of trust with local tech innovators

* Backlash from the very youth it swore to empower

A Bigger Trend: Is Tinubu Backtracking on Youth-Driven Reform?

Let’s be brutally honest: this isn’t an isolated incident.

Since taking office, Tinubu has repeatedly signaled support for youth-led innovation. But critics argue that beneath the surface, there’s a quiet rollback happening:

* Youth-focused policies stalled or underfunded

* Delays in digital legislation

* Inconsistent engagement with the creative community

Umunubo’s removal — and the aggressive language used — may be the clearest sign yet that progressive voices inside the administration are being muzzled.

What Happens Now?

The Presidency remains tight-lipped. There is:

* No successor announced

* No official explanation

* No roadmap for continuity

That leaves stakeholders, from tech startups to Nollywood, in a dangerous state of uncertainty.

In the fast-paced world of tech and creative production, vacuum kills momentum. And Nigeria cannot afford another missed opportunity while other African nations — like Kenya, Rwanda, Ghana, and South Africa — race ahead with digital-first policies.

Political Realignment or Strategic Regression?

President Tinubu may think he’s just cleaning house. But by sacking one of his key youth-tech emissaries without clarity, he risks alienating the very demographic that helped shape his digital economy vision.

Worse, he sends a dangerous message: even merit won’t protect you in this system.

In a world driven by innovation, speed, and trust, this kind of old-school politicking feels not only outdated, but dangerously counterproductive.

Nigeria’s future may be digital, but who’s really in control of that future?

The answer may have just changed.

JAMB UTME Cheats in High-Tech Collusion: Parents, CBT Centres Exposed
Uncategorized

JAMB UTME Cheats in High-Tech Collusion: Parents, CBT Centres Exposed

/

In Nigeria, examinations are supposed to be the final gatekeepers of merit, the sacred line between effort and reward. But what happens when the gatekeepers themselves are hacked, manipulated, and sold to the highest bidder? That is exactly the nightmare JAMB has uncovered in the 2025 UTME.

What was once an exam plagued by crude malpractice, cheat notes scribbled on thighs, impersonators lurking outside centres, or answers whispered in crowded halls—has now mutated into something far more dangerous: a sophisticated, tech-driven fraud industry. With AI impersonations, biometric spoofing, identity morphing, and cyber-hacks now at play, malpractice has evolved from a desperate student’s gamble into an organized syndicate where parents, CBT centres, and even tech experts are active participants.

The revelations are not just about cheating in an exam. They raise a chilling question: if the very system that determines who enters Nigeria’s universities can be so easily compromised, what does that say about the country’s broader future—its institutions, its governance, its values?

Tech-Driven Cheating Like Never Before

For years, UTME malpractice was raw and visible—smuggled papers, impersonators, roaming monkeys. Not anymore. JAMB’s Registrar, Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, revealed a chilling new reality: “biometric and identity fraud” has gone high-tech. Stolen fingerprints, image morphing, biometric spoofing, and albinism falsification are now the cheating tools of choice

These aren’t isolated incidents. The special committee JAMB set up is investigating 6,458 suspect cases, including 4,251 finger-blend manipulations and 192 AI-assisted impersonations. Add to that 1,878 false disability claims, multiple NIN registrations, and widespread collusion with CBT centres. The rot is not just vast—it’s systemic.

Parents and CBT Centres: From Passive to Active Participants

Exam fraud was once a candidate’s solo act. Now, parents are authors.

Parents sponsoring fraud: In Osogbo, students and tutors say parents paid up to ₦250,000 for “miracle centre” operations. One revealed: “Your system logs out… then a proxy writes.”

Also Read: Nigeria’s Health System On Life Support As Abuja Doctors Declare 7-Day Warning Strike

CBT centres aiding fraud: Some centres are reportedly sharing IP addresses and disabling LAN controls to allow remote hacks during exams. “Not every centre,” but enough to corrupt the whole system.

The boundaries between education, technology, and crime have blurred. This is exploitation, not desperation.

JAMB’s Emergency Response

JAMB has not been idle. Here’s how they’re fighting back:

* A 23-member Special Committee was inaugurated to investigate the 6,458 flagged candidates.
* The committee’s terms include identifying methods used, pinpointing culpable individuals, reviewing policies, and proposing preventive systems.
* Targets: fraudulent CBT centres and complicit parents face blacklisting and prosecution. A sweeping three-year ban now applies to perpetrators across exam boards, using NIN tracking for enforcement.

What Nigeria Must Remember

This isn’t mere exam scandal—it’s a societal rot. When cheating becomes transactional and tech-savvy, education is no longer a foundation; it’s a farce. If universities fail to act, qualified candidates will leave the system frustrated, while the dishonest rise unchecked.

That’s why JAMB’s next move matters: will they tighten oversight, revoke CBT accreditations, and demand transparency? Or will this be swept under the rug, with yet another generation cheated out of merit?

Drama As El-Rufai Answers Police Invitation With Petition
News, Politics

Drama As El-Rufai Answers Police Invitation With Petition

/

When a former governor drags a state police command to the Police Service Commission (PSC), it’s not a routine grievance, it’s a political grenade. On 8 September 2025, Nasir El-Rufai formally asked the PSC to investigate what he called “unlawful and unconstitutional conduct” by the Kaduna State Police Command, accusing senior officers of standing aside while suspected thugs attacked an opposition event and of repeatedly violating the Police Act since the current commissioner’s 2024 posting.

The petition is blunt: accountability, now — or the public will assume complicity.

In a petition dated September 8, 2025, El-Rufai alleged that the Commissioner of Police in Kaduna State and some officers had engaged in acts he described as “unlawful and unconstitutional.”

The former governor, in the petition, said he was acting in his capacity as a citizen and demanded urgent action from the PSC.

I am writing as a citizen of Nigeria and former governor of Kaduna State to formally lodge this complaint and demand an immediate, impartial, and exhaustive investigation into the unlawful and unconstitutional conduct of the Commissioner of Police and some officers of the Kaduna State Police Command,” El-Rufai wrote.

The petition comes against the backdrop of a worsening face-off between El-Rufai and the Kaduna Police Command.

The Back Story

On 30 August 2025 suspected political thugs reportedly attacked the inauguration meeting of a transition committee convened by opposition parties linked to the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Kaduna. Attendees, including El-Rufai and other opposition figures, say they were assaulted and property was vandalised.

El-Rufai claims police on the scene watched without intervening, a charge that, if true, suggests either paralysis or collusion. He had earlier petitioned the Inspector-General of Police and now wants the PSC to step in for an “impartial and exhaustive” probe.

The Kaduna Police Command subsequently issued a summons to El-Rufai and several ADC leaders to appear before the State Criminal Investigation Department over allegations including conspiracy and incitement, a development that risks appearing retaliatory.

What El-Rufai’s Petition Actually Says

In his carefully worded letter to the PSC, El-Rufai demanded “an immediate, impartial and exhaustive investigation” into the Commissioner of Police and “some officers” of the Kaduna command for what he described as “abuse of office,” “dereliction of duty,” and repeated violations of the Police Act since 30 December 2024 — the date the present CP resumed duty in Kaduna. He framed the petition as a citizen’s duty to protect rule of law and public confidence in the police.

Did You Miss? Decomposed Body Found At National Assembly Complex

Why that line matters: the PSC is the constitutional body tasked with oversight of policing standards and discipline. By taking his complaint to the PSC rather than only the IGP or the courts, El-Rufai is asking for institutional intervention — and public transparency.

When Two Narratives Collide

This story now spins between two competing narratives:

1. El-Rufai’s case: The state police looked on while political violence unfolded; that cannot be brushed aside as “chaos.”

If security forces selectively enforce the law, democracy dies slowly and visibly. El-Rufai and ADC supporters frame the petition as defending citizens’ constitutional rights.

2. Police counter-narrative: The command says it’s investigating — and has summoned opposition leaders. That sequence risks appearing like retaliation: victims called in as suspects.

If the force uses criminal process to intimidate critics, the institution itself becomes an instrument of political power rather than a protector of citizens.

Both narratives carry political weight; neither can be accepted without an independent fact-finding probe. The PSC’s next moves will determine whether Nigerians see a genuine effort at accountability or another episode in a long pattern of selective policing.

What Nigerians Should Watch For

A functioning democracy depends on a police force that protects everyone, including critics of power. If the PSC’s probe is credible, it could begin to unclog a chokehold of suspicion and restore a small measure of trust.

But if it is perfunctory, expect this episode to not simply fade, it will metastasize into another charge of state partisanship, feeding cycles of protest, recrimination, and deeper democratic decay.

El-Rufai’s petition is no mere bureaucratic note, it is a public dare: prove that the police serve the law, not political interests. How the PSC answers will tell us if Nigeria’s institutions are still, at their core, on the side of the people.

NUPENG Insists on Strike Despite FG’s Last-Minute Intervention
Business, News

NUPENG Defies FG, Shuns Conciliation — Strike Set to Paralyze Nigeria

/

On Monday, NUPENG didn’t just snub the Federal Government — it issued a bold ultimatum: no compromise, no ceasefire, no mercy.
In one of the rawest displays of labor defiance in recent memory, the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) refused to attend a conciliation meeting orchestrated by the Labour Minister. Their message? A powerful and unapologetic warning: “Our strike begins, and only real reform will stop it.”

On Sunday, the Federal Government had appealed to NUPENG to shelve its strike, assuring that it had stepped in to mediate the matter. The government also urged the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) to withdraw the red alert it issued to affiliate unions in solidarity with petroleum workers.

The dispute centres on Dangote Group’s alleged policy against unionisation of its employees, a position NUPENG insists is unacceptable.

“No oil worker will work with Dangote Group without being unionised,” the union declared, accusing the company of pursuing an “anti-workers and anti-union agenda” designed to “enslave” employees rendering critical services in its refinery.

According to the ministry’s spokesperson, Patience Onuobia, the peace meeting was slated to commence by 10am at the Minister’s Conference Room.

However, by 2:30 pm, the session had yet to begin as NUPENG officials were still in Lagos coordinating strike mobilisation.

NUPENG Vs FG: The Face-off

A tripartite meeting was convened by the Labour Ministry to avert a nation-wide strike, but NUPENG deliberately skipped it as tension brewed over Dangote refinery’s controversial anti-union policies.

The union is calling for sweeping changes — including proper union representation and respect for workers’ rights — in response to what they’ve described as a “monopolistic war on trade unions.”

The Labour Ministry had already appealed publicly and sought to de-escalate with a meeting scheduled for Monday — which NUPENG blindsided by rejecting.

What This Says About Power Dynamics

NUPENG’s move echoes a painful truth: in Nigeria, power isn’t held in Aso Rock — it’s under the hoods of tanker trucks and union halls. Their defiance reframed the narrative: this isn’t just a strike threat. It’s an assertion that labor wields the ultimate veto power over the economy.

Also Read: Fuel Scarcity Looms As NUPENG Insists On Strike Despite FG’s Last-Minute Intervention

For many Nigerians, the subtext is undeniable: if NUPENG holds, the country stands still—both physically (with fuel) and politically.

A Strike That Reflects Far More Than Fuel

What started as a disagreement over union rights has now ballooned into a collision between corporate power, labor dignity, and state authority.

By refusing to attend the FG meeting, NUPENG didn’t just skip dialogue, they declared that only decisive action will make them reconsider. If the government can’t deliver tangible reform, this standoff could implode, dragging Nigeria’s economy—and gratitude for Dangote’s refinery—into chaos.

NSCDC Officer Shot Dead in Abuja Hotel — Probe Demanded
News

NSCDC Officer Shot Dead in Abuja Hotel — Probe Demanded

/

On the morning of Sunday, 7 September 2025, DSP Adekunle Emmanuel (reported by some outlets as Adama Adekunle Emmanuel) was discovered with a fatal gunshot wound at a hotel in the Life Camp area of Abuja.

He was rushed to Maitama General Hospital where he was pronounced dead. Multiple security-industry sources say a fellow NSCDC operative fired the shot; some eyewitness and local social-media posts describe the shooting as accidental. Authorities have cordoned the scene and an investigation is said to be ongoing.

The Initial Reports

Frontpage gathered that the incident occurred around 10:20 a.m. on Sunday while the officers were at a hotel or moving from a hotel to a principal’s residence in the Life Camp / Lias Estate axis.

Security analysts and beat journalists (including independent X reporters) have circulated accounts crediting a colleague’s firearm as the source of the lethal bullet; some reports describe it as an accidental discharge. But formal confirmation from NSCDC headquarters or the police is still pending in public reporting.

The fallen officer was taken to Maitama General Hospital where he was pronounced dead; the vehicle and hotel site have been sealed for forensic work.

More Than A Tragic On-Duty Death

A single shooting inside Abuja would be serious on its own. But this incident lands against a troubling backdrop: in recent months NSCDC personnel have been repeatedly targeted, attacked or killed while on duty (several high-profile murders and ambushes have been reported in different states).

That pattern raises two uncomfortable possibilities: external threats targeting security personnel, and internal breakdowns—accidents, poor weapons handling, or cover-ups. Either scenario is damning for Nigeria’s security architecture.

Public Trust Problem

Security agencies depend on public trust and internal discipline. Each poorly explained death drains both. When paramilitary personnel die under unclear circumstances inside the capital, suspicion spreads: Was this an accident, a quarrel, a cover-up, or worse — an internal purge?

Even if the truth is mundane, the political cost is real: fear among frontline operatives, demoralised units, and angry families demanding answers. In a country where security forces are already under scrutiny, the optics are catastrophic.

Accidental Or Symptomatic Of Deeper Rot?

Here’s the hard take many insiders won’t say out loud: accidents are often the result of organisational neglect. Chronic under-training, weak supervision, weapon stockpile mismanagement, and a culture of impunity convert small mistakes into fatalities.

Also Read: APC Accused As Thugs Scatter ADC Rally For Peter Obi And Rhodes-Vivour In Lagos

If the NSCDC is unable to show that the shooting was an isolated tragedy, the corps will face a credibility crisis that stretches from recruitment to national security policy. That’s not hyperbole, Nigeria cannot afford a paramilitary force viewed as unsafe to itself.

Why Nigerians Should Care

This story is about more than one dead officer. It’s a test of institutional honesty and competence. If the state handles this death with openness, it can restore a little trust. If it obfuscates, delays, or buries facts, every citizen, not only NSCDC personnel, will be poorer for it.

At a time when security institutions are the last line between order and chaos, internal deaths must be treated as national emergencies, not internal housekeeping.

Scroll to Top
site logo

Politics

Photo

News

Music

Lifestyle

Health

Gym

Games

Food

Fitness

Feature

Fashion

Entertainment

Education

Design

Dental

Construction

Business

Building

Beauty

Join our newsletter channel